COVER

 EDITORIAL

COVER STORY

- 60th Year of UDHR...

COUNTRY UPDATES

- A Classic Example of a Persecuted Human Rights
Defender


- Celebrating Life...

- UN Human Rights Committee Makes Nepal
Responsible...


- Nepal: Disappearance Commission on Cards

- HRC: The Philippine Violates ...

- Riding along Subway Stops ...

 PHOTO ESSAY

 CONTRIBUTION FROM LATIN
AMERICA


- A New Political Era in Latin America...

BOOK REVIEWS

- A Journey Through Asia...

- Desaparesidos: The Untold Story of Martial Law

 NEWS

- The Youth Speaks in AFAD’s 1st Poster-Making
and Essay-Writing Contests


- AFAD Joins the World Wide Web

- Inter-Faith Conference...

STATEMENT OF SUPPORT

- CHR Statement on the Occasion of the Book
Launching of AFAD...

 
POEM

- Missing the Disappeared
 

COVER STORY


2008: 60th year of the UDHR
10th year of the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders
 

By Erlinda Timbreza-Valerio

The adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) on the eve of 10 December 1948 in New York by the then member-states of the United Nations gave new hope to the world. An embodiment of the civil, political, socio-economic and cultural rights of every member of the global human family, the UDHR was a welcome declaration expected to guide UN member-states in their conduct of governing their countries to usher in societies where justice, peace and prosperity for all would prevail.


Eleanor Roosevelt, the then Chair of the UN Commission which drafted the document cited: “Where after all do human rights begin? In small places, close to home – so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any maps of the world. Yet they are the world of the individual person; the neighborhood he lives in; the school or college he attends; the factory, farm or office where he works. Such are the places where every man, woman, and child seeks equal justice, equal opportunity, equal dignity without discrimination. Unless these rights have meaning there, they have little meaning anywhere. Without concerned citizen action to uphold them  close to home, we shall look in vain for progress in the larger world.” 1

The UDHR celebrates its 60th anniversary this  2008. Sixty years is a long time and this urges us to revisit some Asian countries particularly in relation to the issue of enforced disappearance. These countries were focused on in the book titled: Reclaiming Stolen Lives published and launched by AFAD on the eve of the International Day of the Disappeared (IDD) on 29 August of this year namely, China, India (particularly Jammu & Kashmir), Indonesia, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka and Thailand. (Note: These countries will henceforth be referred to as “the countries.”)

Likewise, the UN adopted the Declaration on Human Rights Defenders on 9 December 1998 so that this year is also the 10th anniversary of yet another historic document. The Declaration is intended to protect those who are directly involved in human rights work so that they can freely perform their tasks. Paradoxically though, many victims of human rights violations including disappearances over the years are human rights defenders, themselves. They were and are at the
forefront of repression and harassment by their own governments as they perform their tasks.


A Flashback to 1948

When the UDHR was adopted in 1948, the world was reeling from the cruelties of World War II particularly the loss of millions of lives and destruction of property. Parents lost their children, wives lost their husbands and children were orphaned. As a whole, the world was wounded and in pain and moving on took such a great effort. Such a global reality prompted the then young UN to
adopt the UDHR.

A brief glance at some Asian countries when the UDHR was adopted… In China, the civil war between the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the Kuomintang was about to end. With the war having ended in 1949, the country came to be called People’s Republic of China (PRC) and was run by the CPC under a single party system. In Jammu & Kashmir, the state became a part of India in 1947, and in 1948, the Indian forces arrived prompting the first war between Pakistan and India over the disputed territory. Indonesia was struggling to be freed from its Dutch colonizers after Japan (which occupied the country in 1942) surrendered in 1945. The country gained independence in 1949. Nepal devised its own constitution called “the Government of Nepal Act 1948” under the Hindu monarchy. Pakistan was engaged in war with India over the disputed territory of Jammu & Kashmir. The Philippines was struggling over the effects of World War II where millions of Filipinos were killed and Manila was left in shambles. While the country was supposed to have gained “independence” in 1946, the then present government continued to be dictated upon and controlled by the US politically and economically. Sri Lanka gained  its independence from its British colonizers in the same year of 1948 and was consequently ruled by a Prime Minister who remained under British tutelage. Thailand was never colonized but was also involved in World War II.

In terms of the countries’ membership in the UN 2, China, India and the Philippines became members in 1945 while Pakistan and Thailand became members in 1946 and 1947 respectively so that the five countries were with the body that adopted the UDHR. Indonesia, Nepal and Sri Lanka became UN members later in the 1950s so that they too are parties to the UDHR for many decades.


Enforced Disappearances in Asia and the Plight of Human Rights Defenders

Some common trends are manifested in the above mentioned countries. Over the past six decades, those who suffered most were the masses of poor people while the few elite ruled and amassed for themselves, their families and cohorts, the wealth of the earth. From the ranks of the poor and also from other sectors rose heroic individuals who fought for the interests of society and became known as human rights defenders. They fought for justice along with their people often at the cost of their lives.

In terms of the phenomenon of enforced disappearance, the book, Reclaiming Stolen Lives, has established that the situation of Asia today is similar to that of Latin America some three decades ago. The common trend in the countries is exemplified in the fact that when the poor and oppressed peoples fought for their basic rights, their governments fought back with full force and violated their rights including that of disappearing them. Reclaiming Stolen Lives presents a total of 5,326 recorded cases of enforced disappearance in the countries but this figure is miniscule compared to those cited by AFAD’s member-organizations. Accordingly, it is very difficult to present a complete documentation of cases. Some families are continuously threatened so that they are forced to remain silent while others have gone back and forth to the police to report their disappeared loved ones but are largely ignored.

However, most families search for their loved ones for years without let-up even amidst repression and threats to their lives. Many formed organizations and actively participate in the justice campaign nationally, regionally and internationally. Developing a strong, united voice, they confront their governments in various ways asking for the whereabouts of the disappeared. In the process, they developed to become human rights defenders themselves and earn the ire of their governments. To date, human rights defenders within the AFAD network have been and continue to be persecuted. To mention some: AFAD’s then chairperson, Munir was poisoned by a lethal dose of arsenic on 7 September 2004, on a Garuda flight from Jakarta to Amsterdam via Singapore. Munir, a lawyer by profession, bravely defended many cases of human rights violations particularly enforced disappearances, was very vocal against the unjust and undemocratic policies of the government and had co-founded several human rights organizations in Indonesia including Imparsial, KontraS and IKOHI. His death was a major blow to the Federation which was actively participating in the negotiation process of the then UN Inter-Sessional Working Group to Elaborate a Draft Legally-Binding Normative Instrument for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances. Munir, together with AFAD’s Secretary-General, were supposed to participate in the September 2004 session of the then drafting body for the international treaty against enforced disappearances. Suciwati, the widow of Munir is unrelenting in her efforts to find truth and justice for her husband’s murder. As a consequence, she is not spared from threats by the alleged perpetrators. Weeks after her husband’s murder, Suciwati received a package with a dead chicken and a letter from the alleged protectors of the New Order Regime stating that if she continued to blame the intelligence authorities for the murder of her husband, her fate would be likened to that of the dead chicken. Never deterred by threats to her life, Suciwati continues to work for justice for her husband whose case is still pending in court four years after his death.

In May 2005, during the 75th session of the UN Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances (UNWGEID), the AFAD Council received a letter from KontraS, its member-organization in Indonesia. The letter cited threats to the life of incumbent AFAD Chairperson Mugiyanto, KontraS Coordinator Usman Hamid and two others within the network. An attached letter from alleged members of the defenders of the New Order stated that these four persons were enemies of the state and if they continued working on the case of Munir, they would be killed within fourteen days. The threat was brought to the attention of the UNWGEID which immediately wrote a letter of concern to the Indonesian government. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, the KontraS office was raided by armed men who destroyed office facilities. KontraS filed a case in the first raid but only seven persons were brought to court and imprisoned for three months. For the second raid, they were looking for Munir who was not there. The raiders said that KontraS was anti-Indonesia. The two raids were reported to the police but no progress was ever achieved.

Aasia Jeelani, former editor of Voices Unheard, a women’s publication in Srinagar, Kashmir and a volunteer of AFAD’s memberorganization, the Association of Parents of Disappeared Persons (APDP), was killed by a landmine on 20 April 2004 while on an election monitoring exercise. Her driver was also killed while two of her colleagues were wounded. One of them, Khurram Parvez, an active member of the AFAD Council, who was with her during the monitoring exercise, had his leg amputated. Khurram Parvez is one of the 2004 recipients of the Reebok Human Rights Award. Atty. Parvez Imroz, the patron of APDP, and a recipient of the Ludovic-Trarieux International Human Rights Prize in 2006, has undergone three assassination attempts the last of which was on 30 June 2008. At around 8:00 PM on that day, nine or ten armed men arrived at his house in Kralpura village (some 8 kilometers from Srinagar) and demanded that Atty. Imroz come outside. Imroz told his wife not to open the door and instead, called his brother, Sheik Mustaq Ahmad, who lives nearby. Mr. Ahmad came out and asked the group to identify themselves which they refused. When his nephew went out, one of the uniformed men fired in his direction but he was hit. Another man threw a grenade outside his front door. This exploded but fortunately no one was hurt. The men left around 10:30 P.M. Villagers who gathered near Imroz’s house stated that they saw an armoured vehicle, two Gypsy cars and men in CRPF (Central Reserve Police Force) and SOG (Special Operations Group) uniforms. At the time this occurred, Atty. Imroz and his fellow human rights defenders had recently formed a “People’s Tribunal” which among others, would look into the reported graves and mass graves estimated to be close to a thousand victims and probably the graves of disappeared Kashmiris.

Somchai Neelaphaijit, former Chairman of the Thailand’s Muslim Lawyers’ Association and former Vice-Chairman of the Human Rights Committee of the Lawyers’ Council in Thailand, disappeared while he was representing five persons arrested because of the militant raid on the Narathiwat Rajanakarin Camp on 4 January 2004. He was last seen at the Chaleena Hotel on Ramkhamhaeng Road in Bangkok on 12 March 2004. His car was found abandoned in Kamphaeng Phet Road near Mor Chit bus terminal. Prior to his disappearance, he was threatened for taking on the cases of two Thai alleged members of the Jemaah Islamiyah, a Southeast Asia based Islamic group accused of carrying out bomb attacks in Thailand. The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) based in Hongkong, gave a Human Rights Defenders’ Award to Somchai in 2006. Somchai’s wife, Angkhana Neelaphaijit, has been persistent in her efforts to obtain justice, unsparing in her criticism of government authorities, and has taken the lead role as an articulate and courageous spokesperson for the families of disappeared persons in Southern Thailand. In giving the award to Somchai, the AHRC also applauded the tremendous contribution that Angkhana has made in confronting the impunity enjoyed by state officers in Thailand. Angkhana, who has brought to national and international authorities the case of her husband, is not spared from threats to her person. She chairs the Working Group on Justice for Peace (WGJP), AFAD’s most recent member-organization.

Human rights violations continue in China. The Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy (TCHRD) appealed through the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) and the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) about the enforced disappearance of five monks from Ramoche Temple namely 39-year-old Mr. Sonam Rabgyal, Damdul, Rabgyal, and two other monks who were arrested during a midnight raid on the monks’ residence on 7 April 2008. On that night, around 70 monks of Ramoche Temple, which is located to the north of Lhasa city, were detained after the Public Security Bureau (PSB) and People’s Armed Police (PAP) forces carried out a midnight raid on the monks’ residence. While most of them were released a few days later after having been interrogated, the whereabouts of Mr. Sonam Rabgyal, Damdul, Rabgyal and two other monks remain unclear. Aside from the five cases of disappearance, the TCHRD in its press release of 25 September 2008, cited that after the outbreak of the major protests across the Tibetan plateau  since 10 March 2008, cases of enforced disappearance of Tibetans surfaced. TCHRD cited “there are at least more than a thousand Tibetans whose current whereabouts and well-being remains completely unknown to their family members and their affiliated monasteries.” 3

In Sri Lanka, human rights defenders continue to be harassed. In another urgent appeal dated 30 September 2008, the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders, a joint programme of the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) and the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), requested urgent intervention. The Observatory cited a grenade attack on the residence of Mr. J.C. Weliamuna, a human rights lawyer and Executive Director of the Sri Lanka chapter of Transparency International. Accordingly on 27 September 2008, at 11.40 PM, an unidentified gang lobbed two hand grenades at the residence of Mr. J.C Weliamuna. Property was damaged but fortunately no bodily harm was caused to Mr. Weliamuna or members of his family. According to the Observatory, Mr. Weliamuna has appeared in highly sensitive cases involving corruption and human rights violations, including pending cases involving government officials and members of the police force. On the day of the attack, Mr. Weliamuna supported a motion at the Bar Council regarding another lawyer who had received death threats due to his appearance in an extrajudicial killing case. The victim had previously brought two complaints against police officers, for bribery and torture. The Bar Council unanimously decided to act on the complaint, condemned interference with the work of lawyers and resolved to pursue the matter with the Inspector General of Police and other competent authorities.

In the Philippines, a new case of enforced disappearance of a human rights defender was reported. Based on the report, Mr. James Balao disappeared on 17 September 2008 on his way to visit his family in La Trinidad, Benguet. He had earlier sent a text message (SMS) to his family that he was on his way home coming from Baguio. He never reached home. Belonging to the Ibaloi and Kankanaey tribes, Mr. Balao is a member of the Cordillera People’s Alliance (CPA) and the president of the Oclupan Clan Association, an organization that works for self-determination of the indigenous peoples of the Cordillera. Prior to his disappearance, Mr. Balao had informed his immediate family that he noticed an unknown group of men routinely watching and following him. After his disappearance, Mr. Balao’s family has been continuously searching for him in all places possible including various military detachments in Northern Philippines – in La Trinidad, Benguet, Lagangilang, Abra and San Fernando, La Union. To this writing though, nothing is known of the whereabouts of Mr. Balao.

In Pakistan, some sectors hope that with the new government headed by the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) led by President Asif Ali Zardari, enforced disappearance and other human rights violations would be resolved and the rule of law would finally prevail in the country. Zardari took the
lead in the PPP after his wife former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto was slain in December 2007. He was elected to the presidency in September 2008 not by public vote but by lawmakers in the two houses of the National Assembly and in the four provincial assemblies in the country.

The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HCRP) cited in its 2007 report that at least 600 people disappeared in Balochistan in 2007. In the same report, it also stated that the “missing in Balochistan could run into the thousands, according to some political organizations in the province.” Before Musharraf deposed the Chief Justice, the Supreme Court had been hearing cases of disappearances leading to the tracing of 56 victims, 45 of whom surfaced in April 2007. 4 Meanwhile, the Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) cited in its statement dated March 3, 2008 that the Lawyers’ Movement in Pakistan which started in March 2007 is at the “vanguard of
democracy” in the country. 5 The movement was ignited by then General Musharraf’s move to illegally and unconstitutionally depose Chief Justice Iftekhar Choudhry. Thousands of lawyers from all over the country along with civil society and human rights organizations, ordinary folk, media and other sectors consistently fought for the ousting of Musharraf, the reinstatement of the Chief Justice, the return of the rule of law, the supremacy of the judiciary and the restoration of the constitution. The people’s rallies, marches, and other mass movements in 2007 until the first half of 2008 composed of thousands of people led to the resignation of Musharraf on 18 August 2008.

Earlier, Amnesty International (AI) delivered a report titled: Denying the Undeniable: Enforced Disappearances in Pakistan 6 in July 2008. AI cited that its report makes use of “Official Supreme Court transcripts, together with affidavits from people released following periods of enforced disappearance and communications from lawyers representing persons subjected to enforced disappearance.” The report provides details on cases of enforced disappearances and the justice campaign espoused by the families of victims. In September of this year, AI supported Ms. Amina Masood Janjua, the wife of a disappeared in Pakistan and leader of an advocacy group called “Defense of Human Rights,” in her travel tour to some European countries including the US to speak on enforced disappearance and gather international support. She made her trip to Europe but her visa to Washington, DC was revoked by the US embassy in Islamabad

In Nepal, the Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Advocacy Forum (AF) came out with a report on 11 September 2008 titled: “Waiting for Justice: Unpunished Crimes from Nepal’s Armed Conflict.” In said report, the two organizations call on the new Maoistled government of Nepal “to investigate and prosecute those responsible for thousands of extrajudicial killings, torture, and enforced disappearances during the country’s decade-long armed conflict.” 7 The report documents in detail 62 cases of killings, disappearances, and torture between 2002 and 2006 perpetrated by the security forces but including a couple of cases involving Maoists. The families of victims have earlier filed complaints with the police seeking investigations but these complaints were not responded to. (Note: For more details on Nepal’s development, please, refer to separate articles in this issue.)

In sum, as we commemorate the 60th anniversary of the UDHR and the 10th anniversary of the Declaration on Human Rights Defenders this year, 2008, the implementation of human rights – “…in small places, close to home – so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any maps of the world …” cited by Eleanor Roosevelt in 1948 has still a long way to go. Certainly, the updates cited above are but a small part of what is actually happening in the above countries. It is, indeed, very sad that enforced disappearances and other forms of human rights violations, some of which were committed from decades back remain unresolved to this day in the very countries which are parties to the UDHR, the Declaration on Human Rights Defenders and many other universal treaties. As the situation persists, the wounds and pains suffered by families and relatives of victims remain and societies continue to be  unhealed. A big achievement though is that people from all nooks and corners of the region and in the world along with their advocacy groups and human rights organizations continue to struggle for justice and for the implementation of human rights in their own countries amidst repression and threats to their lives. Certainly, the achievements in each country are achievements for the continent and the whole global society.


References:

1Eleanor Roosevelt, wife of the former USA President, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Chair of the United Nations Commission that wrote the Universal Declaration in 1948; www.udhr.net/index.php/eleanor-roosevelt, retrieved October 13, 2008

2 www.un.org/members/list.shtml, retrieved October 14, 2008

3 More cases of Enforced and Involuntary Disappearance surface from Tibet, Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy (TCHRD), www.tchrd.org/press/2008, retrieved October 16, 2008

4 HCRP Annual Report, State of Human Rights in 2007, www. hrcpweb. org, retrieved October 20, 2008

5 Pakistan: Lawyers’ Movement is at the ‘vanguard of democracy,’ a Statement of the Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC), March 3, 2008, retrieved Oct. 20, 2008

6 Denying the Undeniable: Enforced Disappearances in Pakistan by Amnesty International published July 2008, www.amnesty.org, retrieved Oct. 16, 2008

7 Waiting for Justice: Unpunished Crimes from Nepal’s Armed Conflict, A Joint Report of Human
Rights Watch and Advocacy Forum, September 11, 2008, http://hrw.org/reports/2008/nepal0908,
retrieved Oct. 16, 2008


VOICE December  2008

 

Copyright 2008  AFAD - Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances
Web Design by: www.listahan.org