I. Editorial

II. Cover Story

III. Country
 Situations:

Kashmir

Pakistan (1)

Pakistan (2)

Philippines

IV. News Feature:

Trial on Munir’s Case: To Reveal the Mastermind, or To Find a Scapegoat?

V. Feature Articles:

Fr. Rudy Romano, Missing But Still Alive…

Modern-Day Heroes

They Shall Overcome

Until When Shall We Wait? 

VI. Review

VII. Year-end Report

VII. AFAD Song

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

 

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

 

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

 

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

 

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances

COUNTRY SITUATION:
Pakistan

by Atty. Farooq Niazi

 

Thrown in a Far -Away Land 

Mr. Ijaz Khan, Village: Kafal Garh, Tehsil & District: Bagh (PAK), belongs to a very poor family comprising his old and poor parents, two brothers and three sisters. He could not afford to get formal education in school and was put into a religious madrassa1 in Islamabad, Pakistan; where he found shelter for some period at the outset of his career.

B ut soon his madrassa was divided into two due to the machinations  of  the administration and he had  to shift to a different madrassa. But since their religious teachers (theo-fascists) use their students for multiple purposes, he could not stay there for  long and had to give up his studies to enter into a labor market to work as a manual laborer so that he could feed his family. Here, due to inter-action with labor leaders, he joined some sort of trade union but also remained connected with his previous classmates from madrassa. That is why, through them, after ‘Talibanization’ of Afghanistan, he went to Kabul to get  a good employment. 

The Talibans had already established their government., but Ijaz was unable to get a job and had to return to Pakistan after five  to six months. Again, he started manual labor as a construction worker to earn his livelihood. Then one day, he came to know that one of his ex-colleagues had been caught in Afghanistan  after the overthrow of the  Taliban “government.” 

He was going to visit his home, Kafal Garh (Bagh-PAK) on 15 January 2002 with some money for his family, and when he reached near his home, he was abducted by a few men who did not show their identity. They were in plain clothes and belonged to the elite intelligence agency of Pakistan Armed Forces, ISI, as it occurred to everybody later on. His family was extremely disturbed and broken-hearted to hear this because he was not a member of any political group or party, nor did he belong to any militant faction.  

Then his case was reported to the local police and was also registered  with the Truth and Justice Commission (T&JC) by one, Raja Munir, the President of Jammu Kashmir Human Rights Movement (JKHRM), PAK, at 4 pm on 15-01-2002. The following information was received about his person: 

He is a modest, humble and simple person, wears a beard and prays regularly and had had no contact with any political or religious party nor with any militant group either. He was just a laborer on daily wages to feed his family and has had only casual relations with labor unions etc.  

The Truth and Justice Commission addressed a press conference and disclosed that some people from Pakistan had been abducted jointly by FBI and ISI to send them to Guantanamo Bay (Cuba), but the Pakistani Government quickly denied it as only an allegation. However, later on, the  Pakistani Government  admitted that some 500 men had been handed over to the United States of America  to be sent on to Guantanamo Bay (Cuba). But the legal position of the case is that the Pakistani Government cannot hand over any of the accused to any other country without first producing the person in a court of law. 

As far as the Guantanamo Bay (Cuba) is concerned, it is a holding camp for the purpose of prolonged interrogation of detainees. Its purpose is not only to detain but also to extract information from the detainees. A US soldier at Guantanamo Bay revealed that the purpose of this Bay was to detain and to extract information from detainees. What little is known of the conditions of detention and interrogation techniques used here has been gleaned from accounts of the released detainees. 134 detainees have been released unconditionally and 12 have been released into continued detention (7 Russians, 4 Saudis and 1 Spaniard). The intelligence value of those held there must be open to question given that charges have only been laid against three of the detainees and the stated views of  certain US officials is that those detained there are mid to low level security risks. 

MG Miller, then Commander of the Joint Task Force at Guantanamo  Bay, apparently made certain recommendations for operational procedures at Abu Gharib detention center in Iraq that are said to be based on experience in Guantanamo Bay. Recent revelations of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and punishment at Abu Gharib provide an indication of the likely conditions of detention at Guantanamo Bay. MG Miller recommended that the detention guard force be dedicated and trained for the setting of conditions for the successful interrogation and exploitation of detainees. According to his assessment, the function of detention operations is to “provide a safe, secure and humane environment that supports the expeditious collection of intelligence.” 

 

Conditions of Transfer to Guantanamo Bay  

Prior to their transfer to this Bay, detainees’ beards were reportedly shaved off, an act which is considered humiliating for Muslim men. Hands and feet were apparently bound, cuffed and taped. Detainees were said to be blindfolded, gagged and ears taped. On board the airplane to Guantanamo Bay, detainees were chained to hand rests and restrained to their seats by straps across their bodies, and were sedated and rendered unconscious during the flight. Once at their destination, they reportedly were thrown off the plane while bound, gagged and blindfolded. 

There was a no talking rule in the first one and a half months of detention. During that time, there was reportedly little tolerance for religious practice. Attempts to pray resulted in  beatings and gagging. However, the  trials, tribulations and torture did not end there.22 

( Note: For detailed account of the conditions, kindly refer to page-47 of ‘Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism and Torture – July, 2004). 

Although the detention of Mr. Ijaz Khan is secret as the perpetrators did not disclose their identity and the place of detention is also not known, the case was, however, reported to the local police as well as to the T &JC. After addressing the press conference, the T &JC wrote a letter to all the concerned including President, Prime Minister, Home Minister, Pakistan Human Rights Commission (HRCP), and other organizations such as USA and European Union Embassies; and such letters are being sent on a monthly basis. The case has also been highlighted through the media .  

Despite this fact, everybody including T&JC remained  completely clueless for eight  long months. Then after some eight months, a letter by Mr. Ijaz Khan himself was received through the Red Cross and it was revealed that he was under detention; although the place of detention still remains unknown. T&JC again addressed a press conference to highlight this as well as some other similar cases, and also remained in constant contact with the Red Cross. 

In April 2004, the Red Cross was informed that Mr. Ijaz Khan had been sent back to Pakistan after having been declared white, but his release  was not being confirmed by anybody. The Truth and Justice Commission, however, continued its struggle and soon discovered that Ijaz was kept in Adiala Jail, Rawalpindi (Pakistan), but the jail authorities flatly refused to admit of his existence there. Then, according to some sources, he was known to have been moved to Gujranwala Jail (Pakistan) and that his parents were allowed to meet him, if they liked, with the permission of Punjab Home Department. T&JC approached Home Department of Punjab through HRCP, but the said Department also refused to confirm the whereabouts of Mr. Ijaz Khan. The struggle to trace him continued and ultimately, it has been revealed recently that he has been shifted to Muzaffarabad Jail (PAK), which has been confirmed by now. Now, the plan of action for the future being adopted by T &JC is as follows: 

A writ petition shall be filed for his release.   A suit shall be filed against the Government  of USA and Pakistan. The legal action shall be taken and the other measures shall also be adopted to get the detainee and his family rehabilitated. 

Some legal questions are also involved in this case which are as follows: 

    Abduction of an innocent and peaceful citizen;

    Outright refusal by the state regarding his whereabouts;

    Shifting him to Guantanamo Bay (Cuba) without due process of law;.

    Torture at Guantanamo Bay (Cuba) during detention. 

Since the Supreme Court of USA has held that ‘Guantanamo Bay  (Cuba) is not USA’s territory and, therefore, anybody wanted by USA could not be detained  there; the entire process becomes illegal and unconstitutional, although the  US  Government is responsible for its management. 

There is no extradition treaty between PAK/Pakistan and USA. Even if there is one, Guntanamo Bay (Cuba) is not USA’s territory. In view of the foregoing facts, Mr. Ijaz Khan (now in Muzaffarabad Jail – PAK) has been grossly wronged for no fault, crime or sin of his own and, therefore, should be properly and adequately compensated.

 

Footnote:

1 Seminary
 

Atty. Farooq Niazi   is  a founding member  of the Human  Rights  Movement in Pakistan. He is also a  founding member  of  Civil  Liberties  Council  and has  remained  its president for 8 years . Atty. Niazi  is  currently the Coordinator  of Truth  and Justice Commission in Muzaffarabad, Pakistan. 

Copyright 2007  AFAD - Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances
Web Design by: www.listahan.org